Will Toxic Covid Jabs Be Mandated in the US and West? — Stephen Lendman

Will Toxic Covid Jabs Be Mandated in the US and West? — Stephen Lendman

Will Toxic Covid Jabs Be Mandated in the US and West?

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org – Home – Stephen Lendman)

Toxic covid jabs are designed to destroy health, shorten lifespans, and kill maximum numbers of people worldwide.

Their widespread use is all about a diabolical depopulation scheme — planned genocide on an unparalleled scale.

If mass-jabbing for seasonal flu-renamed covid is mandated ahead in the US, West, or elsewhere, the ruling will breach the Nuremberg Code that requires voluntary consent on all things related to health.

US federal law prohibits mandated use of vaccines and other drugs not approved by the FDA.

Experimental, fast-tracked, inadequately tested, toxic covid mRNA drugs and vaccines were given emergency use authorization alone after 6 – 8 months of development when no emergency exists.

The same applies to PCR tests not designed to detect viral infections, face masks that don’t protect and risk respiratory harm from longterm use, and social distancing that destroys normal interactions among Americans in breach of the First Amendment’s right of assembly — while serving no public health purpose.

All of the above also breach the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and other international laws.

If covid mass-jabbing is mandated in the US, West and/or elsewhere, it’ll be an unparalleled breach of the right to life, liberty, as well as other essential human and civil rights.

Yet time and again, politicians, bureaucrats and judges ignore international law or twist it to serve their interests.

In flagrant breach of the Nuremberg Cods, other international law and US federal law, Texas US District Court Judge Lynn Hughes acted this way by dismissing a lawsuit by over 100 Houston Methodist Hospital (HMH) staff members.

They were unlawfully suspended for refusing to self-inflict harm from toxic covid jabs as a condition of employment.

Hughes ruled that Texas law — overridden by federal and international law he failed to explain — only protects employees from sacking if asked to commit criminality, adding:

“Receiving a (covid jab) is not an illegal act (sic).”

Plaintiff Jennifer Bridges et al’s claim that covid jabs are “experimental and dangerous (is) false (sic) and…irrelevant (sic).”

She and they “can freely choose to accept or refuse (covid jabs).” 

If refuse, they “need to work somewhere else.” 

“If a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he (or she) may be properly fired.” 

“Every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for remuneration. That is all part of the bargain (sic).”

Ignored by Hughes is that employers have no legal right to mandate that their staff self-inflict harm.

Covid jabs harm health. Mandating their use breaches international and US federal law.

Representing Bridges et al, attorney Jared Woodfil vowed to appeal the unlawful ruling against them, adding:

He’s “committed to fighting (the hospital’s) unjust policy.”

“The problem with that line of thinking is that you’re telling (its) employees (that) they are going to be human guinea pigs.”

According to Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel Mary Holland:

“(T)here are grounds for an appeal,” adding:

“(T)he judge has misinterpreted federal law and does not fully understand the true implications of Emergency Use Authorization status.” 

“Because EUA means the product is experimental, you can’t be forced to take it.” 

“No employer can mandate (covid jabs) while (they’re) under EUA.”

HMH CEO Dr. Marc Boom falsely claimed that “employees who refuse to” be jabbed for covid risk harm to patients.

According to Pfizer documents reported by Pandemic News, individuals jabbed with its experimental covid mRNA drug “shed…spike protein particles” through bodily fluids, breath and skin, infecting others around them.

Jon Rapport’s No More Fake News revealed it, saying covid jabbed individuals are “shed(ing) (and spreading) something harmful” from themselves to others, adding:

“(M)any different dangerous and harmful processes can be detonated in the human body…”

“(G)enetic effects (drift) from person to person, whether” covid jabbed or not.

Covid jabbed individuals and others in close contact with them are unwittingly part of a diabolical human experiment that can only end badly for countless millions or billions of people if continues unchecked.

Toxic covid jabs compromise human immunity instead of boosting it as falsely claimed.

Israeli researchers discovered the same thing, saying individuals jabbed with Pfizer’s mRNA covid drug were “disproportionately” more likely to contact the disease compared to their unjabbed counterparts.

What applies to Pfizer’s toxic mRNA drug is true as well for Moderna, J & J, AstraZeneca and Novavax, the latter firm’s vaccine the latest entry into the covid mass-jabbing sweepstakes.

They’re all toxic, unapproved, experimental and destructive of health when taken as direct.

We’ve been consistently and repeatedly scammed by diabolical dark forces and their press agent media to believe that what destroys health is beneficial.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: